By Tao Jiang

Are there Buddhist conceptions of the subconscious? if that is so, are they extra Freudian, Jungian, or whatever else? If no longer, can Buddhist conceptions be reconciled with the Freudian, Jungian, or different versions? those are a few of the questions that experience prompted smooth scholarship to strategy ālayavijñāna, the storehouse awareness, formulated in Yogācāra Buddhism as a subliminal reservoir of trends, conduct, and destiny possibilities.

Tao Jiang argues convincingly that such questions are inherently tricky simply because they body their interpretations of the Buddhist suggestion mostly when it comes to responses to fashionable psychology. He proposes that, if we're to appreciate ālayavijñāna competently and examine it with the subconscious responsibly, we have to swap the way in which the questions are posed in order that ālayavijñāna and the subconscious can first be understood inside their very own contexts after which recontextualized inside of a dialogical surroundings. In so doing, convinced paradigmatic assumptions embedded within the unique frameworks of Buddhist and smooth mental theories are uncovered. Jiang brings jointly Xuan Zang’s ālayavijñāna and Freud’s and Jung’s subconscious to target what the diversities are within the thematic matters of the 3 theories, why such transformations exist by way of their goals, and the way their tools of theorization give a contribution to those differences.

Contexts and discussion places forth a desirable, erudite, and punctiliously argued presentation of the subliminal brain. It proposes a brand new paradigm in comparative philosophy that examines the what, why, and the way in navigating the similarities and changes of philosophical platforms via contextualization and recontextualization.

Show description

Read or Download Contexts and Dialogue: Yogacara Buddhism and Modern Psychology on the Subliminal Mind (Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy Monographs) PDF

Best buddhism books

Reconciliation: Healing the Inner Child

An exhilarating contribution to the becoming pattern of utilizing Buddhist practices to inspire well being and stability psychological well-being. Reconciliation makes a speciality of aware information of our feelings and gives concrete practices to revive broken relationships via meditations and workouts to assist recognize and remodel the damage that many people could have skilled as young ones.

Buddhisms: An Introduction

Ddhisms: An creation represents a unique means of providing the entire of the Buddhist culture in its cohesion and multiplicity. transparent in its factors, replete with tables and recommendations for additional analyzing, it may attract scholars, but even be of curiosity to students for a few of its methods of viewing the Buddha, his teachings, and the Buddhist neighborhood during the a long time.

Qué es el Zen? - Introducción práctica al budismo Zen.

En el Zen nada puede sustituir al contacto directo con un verdadero Maestro de los angeles Transmisión, y menos aún un libro.
En los angeles entrada de las bibliotecas de los monasterios Zen japoneses se puede leer una frase caligrafiada: "Este es el dedo que señala l. a. luna. " Un libro no puede ser más que un dedo que señala l. a. luna. los angeles luna representa los angeles auténtica Verdad de nuestra existencia. Un libro puede tener el poder de hacernos dirigir nuestra mirada hacia esa Verdad. Un Maestro Zen debe tener l. a. facultad de ayudarnos a llegar a ella.
Por esta razón, los angeles presente obra no es un guide Zen, no es un recetario, no está hecho con esa intención. Su pretensión es los angeles de familiarizar al lector con el mundo del Zen y los angeles de despertar en él reflexiones importantes acerca de su vida cotidiana.
Las explicaciones prácticas pueden ayudar a aquellos que ya practican en un Dojo, o en solitario, y espero que sean útiles para acercar a los angeles práctica de los angeles meditación a aquellas personas que, bien por desconocimiento, bien por indecisión, aún no lo han hecho.

Additional info for Contexts and Dialogue: Yogacara Buddhism and Modern Psychology on the Subliminal Mind (Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy Monographs)

Example text

In other words, it is a capacity, not an efficacy. As such, it is only potentially efficacious. Because a dharma is defined by its causal efficacy according to Buddhists, a mere capacity, or potential efficacy, cannot qualify it as a dharma. As a result, although we might want to think that seeds actually exist, their existence is not a dharmic existence. That is, they exist nominally or as a designation (prajñapti) that is neither existing nor non-existing. In making a distinction between anuéaya and paryavasth1va, Sautr1ntikas hope to solve the following dilemma: If the akuéala-m[las [roots of evil volitions] are not annihilated till the attainment of arhatship and if they are incompatible with the kuéalam[las [roots of good volitions], how are we to explain the operation of kuéala-m[las or of kuéala volitions in a mundane (alukika) existence?

Jiang_Contexts and Dia 9/26/06 1:08 PM Page 17 Introduction 17 lations of the subliminal consciousness, I will treat the dialogue as a new context that brings them together. If the prevailing issue that drives the formulation of the subliminal mind within the original contexts is the truthfulness of such a concept, the issue that arises in the new dialogical context is reoriented toward probing into the perspective within which such a truth claim can be justified. It is my hope that this dialogical inquiry into the conception of the subliminal consciousness will shed new light on a notion that is well known in modern intellectual discourse as well as popular parlance.

126–127, original italics)13 Nevertheless, the Pudgalav1dins’ effort is rejected by the majority of Buddhists because it violates the orthodox teaching of an1tman. In the course of pursuing more satisfying solutions to the problem of “whose,” Buddhists embark on a truly radical path. ” These inquiries arise only within the linguistic convention and as such it is not necessarily reflective of the reality, whatever that may be. ” I will use the theory of karma, due to its immediate relevance to the origination of the concept of 1layavijñ1na, to illustrate how the above issues concerning “whose” can be addressed.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.35 of 5 – based on 29 votes