By Leonidas Tsilipakos
Departing from a priority with yes ’hard’ difficulties in social conception and focusing as a substitute at the theoretical concepts hired of their resolution, particularly on how those innovations rely on what the writer calls the theoretical perspective in the direction of language, this ebook considers no matter if those recommendations, faraway from being critical publications to considering, may perhaps actually lead social theorists to misconceive the ideas constitutive of social existence. applying the insights and perform of normal Language Philosophy, understood as encompassing the paintings of Wittgenstein, Ryle, Austin and their fans, readability and Confusion in Social thought unearths the profound logical flaws in a number of the significant methodological systems usually hired in social concept for facing options, delivering replacement techniques to social scientists and philosophers for tackling the conceptual matters that experience so bedevilled social technological know-how from its inception. A lucid explication of standard Language Philosophy and the aptitude that it bargains for deepening and re-orienting theoretical paintings within the social sciences, this quantity, except being a problem to the influential severe Realist paradigm, constitutes a thorough critique of social theoretical cause. As such, it's going to entice social theorists and philosophers of social technological know-how, people with pursuits in study tools and thought development, and a person drawn to considering sincerely approximately society.
Read or Download Clarity and Confusion in Social Theory: Taking Concepts Seriously PDF
Similar history & philosophy books
This ebook explores the Catholic Church's engagement with technological know-how and expertise within the 20th century through targeting the $64000 function of 4 famous Catholic intellectuals representing the varied highbrow currents in their iteration. The publication unpacks either the demanding situations and rewards of pursuing such efforts among the Modernist predicament and the second one Vatican Council.
This significant new sequence within the philosophy of technology goals to supply a brand new iteration of textbooks for the topic. The sequence won't simply provide clean remedies of middle issues within the concept and technique of medical wisdom, but additionally introductions to more moderen components of the self-discipline. additionally, the sequence will disguise subject matters in present technological know-how that bring up major foundational matters either for medical thought and for philosophy extra as a rule.
Because the Nineteen Fifties, many philosophers of technological know-how have attacked positivism—the conception that medical wisdom is grounded in goal fact. Reconstructing the historical past of those evaluations, John H. Zammito argues that whereas so-called postpositivist theories of technology are quite often invoked, they really supply little aid for stylish postmodern ways to technological know-how reports.
- Iris Runge: A Life at the Crossroads of Mathematics, Science, and Industry
- Science and Controversy: A Biography of Sir Norman Lockyer, Founder Editor of Nature (Macmillan Science)
- Charles Darwin: A Companion
- The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis
- A century of mathematics in America.
Additional resources for Clarity and Confusion in Social Theory: Taking Concepts Seriously
Far from constituting an advance in our understanding, however, this form of reasoning has frequently brought confusion. This is demonstrated with detailed reference to a recent debate centred on Rom Harré’s attempt to tackle the issue of whether social structures are real. A number of conceptual procedures that are employed by ontological projects, including Critical Realism, are examined and shown to be seriously flawed. More generally, it is argued that ontological projects are mainly fuelled by a misconceived picture of language and that, once this picture is exposed as incoherent, ontology loses its intelligibility.
Might not OLP add another string to our bow, so to speak, assisting not, since it is a philosophy, in data collection and analysis, but rather in theory construction? I would certainly not look unfavourably upon such a prospect though it does not sound like this is exactly what you are suggesting. B: Not quite. Let me make a first statement on the nature of these methods and the purpose of employing them. As far as their nature is concerned, OLP’s ‘methods’ are not technical procedures but are through and through dependent on our linguistic competence and the ways we already possess of clarifying what we mean, explaining how what we say makes sense, displaying that we understand an utterance, etc.
To the extent that it is thought that one must go into the field, the kind of problem one is dealing with is misrecognised. This is so because deciding whether what any of these groups are doing is something political or not, far from keeping the sense of ‘the political’ as a stable backdrop to the investigation treats it as one of the things in question.