By Marshall Clagett

This quantity maintains Marshall Clagett's experiences of a number of the facets of the technological know-how of historic Egypt. the quantity provides a discourse at the nature and accomplishments of Egyptian arithmetic and likewise informs the reader as to how our wisdom of Egyptian arithmetic has grown because the book of the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus towards the tip of the nineteenth century. the writer charges and discusses interpretations of such authors as Eisenlohr, Griffith, Hultsch, Peet, Struce, Neugebauer, Chace, Glanville, van der Waerden, Bruins, Gillings, and others. He additionally additionally considers stories of newer authors akin to Couchoud, Caveing, and Guillemot.

Show description

Read or Download Ancient Egyptian Science, A Source Book. Volume Three: Ancient Egyptian Mathematics (Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society) PDF

Best history & philosophy books

Between Science and Religion: The Engagement of Catholic Intellectuals with Science and Technology in the Twentieth Century

This ebook explores the Catholic Church's engagement with technological know-how and know-how within the 20th century by means of targeting the $64000 position of 4 admired Catholic intellectuals representing the various highbrow currents in their iteration. The ebook unpacks either the demanding situations and rewards of pursuing such efforts among the Modernist quandary and the second one Vatican Council.

Philosophy of Biology (Philosophy and Science)

This significant new sequence within the philosophy of technology goals to supply a brand new new release of textbooks for the topic. The sequence won't basically provide clean remedies of center subject matters within the idea and method of clinical wisdom, but in addition introductions to more moderen parts of the self-discipline. moreover, the sequence will disguise issues in present technological know-how that bring up major foundational matters either for clinical conception and for philosophy extra commonly.

A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour

Because the Nineteen Fifties, many philosophers of technology have attacked positivism—the idea that medical wisdom is grounded in aim fact. Reconstructing the heritage of those evaluations, John H. Zammito argues that whereas so-called postpositivist theories of technology are quite often invoked, they really offer little aid for stylish postmodern techniques to technological know-how reports.

Extra info for Ancient Egyptian Science, A Source Book. Volume Three: Ancient Egyptian Mathematics (Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society)

Sample text

It is telling that Kitcher’s (2012b, 188–​91) discussion of applications focuses on the most elementary sort of case: the use of numbers in counting collections. It is universally agreed that if this were the only use for number words, there would be no ground for regarding mathematical statements as descriptive. The impulse to do so comes when we begin to use mathematical statements in reasoning. It is at this point that the realist has a clear advantage: she can say that this reasoning is just what it seems to be, and she can elaborate the details in Frege’s way.

Her proof does not license the use of S itself as a premise in further derivations. ” The evidence that persuades us that Con(ZFC) is almost certainly true thus resembles the evidence for Goldbach’s Conjecture. Whatever force this evidence may have, it is not the sort of evidence that licenses “inscribing” the sentence in question “in the books,” at least not according to the methodological norms of mathematics as we have them. What can the formalist say about Con(ZFC)? Is it derivable in a game worth playing and hence true in the only available sense?

But that is not what we say. Like any statement beyond ZFC, Con(ZFC) comes with K i t c h e r a g a i n s t t h e P l at o n i s t s [ 33 ] a question mark (if only a very faint one in this case). Unlike the axiom of infinity or the axiom of choice, Con(ZFC) is not an acceptable, fully detachable resource for proving theorems. So if mathematical truth simply consists in derivability in a system that is fully acceptable for this purpose, Kitcher’s formalist must say that Con(ZFC) is not true. Of course this is not to say that Con(ZFC) is false.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.15 of 5 – based on 5 votes